The editorial tool that

ScriptorAI gives editors a complete picture of every manuscript — plot holes, continuity errors, open threads, and punctuation — before you write a single note.

Set up in seconds. Deliver a better editorial report.

Scriptor AI · Thread Analysis 4 issues found
Plot Hole High
Evidence box destroyed in Ch. 3 — quoted from verbatim in Ch. 6.
Open Thread Medium
The theif never names who taught him to pick locks. 5 mentions, no payoff.
Mystery Medium
The stranger at the funeral. Seen 3 times across the manuscript, never identified.
Inconsistency High
Elena's eyes are blue in Ch. 2, green in Ch. 9. No scene explains the change.

Built around the hardest
part of editing.

Most tools check grammar. Scriptorai reads the entire manuscript — and shows you every issue to flag.

Story Thread &
Plot Hole Analysis
Reads the full manuscript and tracks every planted detail, unresolved tension, and open question — then categorises what's a plot hole, what's deliberate mystery, and what still needs a payoff. Ready to paste straight into your editorial letter.
Plot Hole Evidence box destroyed in Ch. 3 — quoted from verbatim in Ch. 6.
Open Thread John never names who taught him to pick locks. 5 mentions, no resolution.
Mystery The stranger at the funeral. Seen 3 times across the manuscript, never identified.
Inconsistency Elena's eyes are blue in Ch. 2, green in Ch. 9. No scene explains the change.
Punctuation Engine
Run any passage through a full punctuation sweep before marking it up. Commas, em-dashes, dialogue tags, apostrophes — logged and corrected in seconds.
Changes · 5 corrections
• Comma splice → semicolon
• Missing apostrophe — "its" → "it's"
• Ellipsis → em-dash (mid-sentence)
• Comma before closing quotation mark
• Em-dash spacing normalized
Character Index
Every character tracked — role, relationships, and chapter appearances. Instantly spot inconsistencies in who knows what, and when.
John Hale
Main
14 chapters
Elena Voss
Supporting
disappears Ch. 7
The Stranger
Recurring
3 mentions
Thread Timeline
See every thread mapped across the chapters — when they open, where they peak, and whether they close. Flag dangling threads before the author sees your notes.
Unsigned letter
Nora / Cassel
The bridge
Grey coat
Open Thread
Temp Suspense
Plot Hole
Mystery
14+
issues found per manuscript on average
200k
words — full novel covered in one pass
4
issue types: plot holes, threads, inconsistencies, punctuation
<3 min
from paste to complete editorial report

Threads the author missed — that you need to flag.

Every planted detail, unresolved tension, and open question in the manuscript. Tracked, analyzed, and ready to include in your editorial report.

Open Threads High
Who sent the unsigned letter that arrived the night before the assassination?
Ch 3 · 4 mentions
Evidence
In Ch 3 Aldric finds a wax-sealed letter slipped under his door with no signature — only the phrase "don't go to the council." He ignores it. The letter reappears in Ch 8 when his sister recognises the handwriting, but the scene cuts away before she names the writer.
Reason

This is a load-bearing mystery thread. The letter is introduced as a warning that went unheeded, and the Ch 8 near-reveal signals the author intends a payoff — but no chapter in the provided window delivers it. Readers have been tracking this since Ch 3.

Confidence
96% confidence
Missing Explanation

The sender of the letter and how they knew about the assassination in advance is never disclosed in the provided manuscript window.

Possible Explanations
  • A council insider who wanted to warn Aldric without exposing themselves
  • The sister herself — written before she lost her memory of the event
  • The assassin, as a deliberate misdirection to establish an alibi
Chapter Mentions
Ch 3first appearance
Ch 5related followup
Ch 8related followup
Ch 12no resolution found
Recommended Check
Verify whether a later chapter completes the Ch 8 near-reveal; if absent, the dangling recognition scene will read as an authorial oversight rather than deliberate suspense.
Temporary Suspense Medium
Why does Nora go pale when she hears the name "Cassel" for the first time?
Ch 6 · 2 mentions
Evidence
In Ch 6 a stranger mentions Cassel in passing and Nora "went very still, the colour draining from her face." She changes the subject immediately. The reaction is noted by the narrator but never explained within the provided window.
Reason

This is a character-history suspense thread. The physical reaction is too deliberate to be incidental — the author is planting prior knowledge. It reads as intentional withholding rather than a plot hole, but needs resolution before the midpoint or it will feel forgotten.

Confidence
91% confidence
High ⚠ Plot Hole
The bridge was destroyed in Ch 4 — the characters cross it on foot in Ch 11
Ch 4 · 3 mentions
Evidence
Ch 4: "The bridge collapsed into the gorge — there was no crossing it now, not for years." Ch 11: the group crosses the same named bridge without comment, and it bears their weight without issue. No chapter between them mentions repairs or an alternate route.
Reason

This is a direct continuity contradiction. A physical landmark confirmed destroyed in Ch 4 is used as a functional crossing in Ch 11. No intervening chapter establishes repair, replacement, or an alternate explanation. This will break reader trust if left unaddressed.

Confidence
98% confidence
Missing Explanation

No chapter between Ch 4 and Ch 11 explains how the bridge was repaired, replaced, or bypassed — yet the characters cross it as though the destruction never occurred.

Possible Explanations
  • A short scene in Ch 9 or 10 establishing hasty repairs would resolve it
  • Change Ch 11 to use a rope crossing or ford — removing the bridge entirely
  • Soften the Ch 4 destruction so "unusable" rather than "gone" — buys flexibility
Chapter Mentions
Ch 4source — destruction stated
Ch 7no resolution found
Ch 11contradiction — bridge used
Recommended Check
Either add a repair scene between Ch 4 and Ch 11, or revise one of the two references — the current state is a hard continuity error that attentive readers will flag.
Open Mystery High
A woman in a grey coat appears in the background of three separate crime scenes — and nobody notices
Ch 2 · 3 mentions
Evidence
In Ch 2 she stands across the street when Maren's body is discovered. In Ch 7 she is visible at the back of the crowd at the inquest. In Ch 14 she is seated alone in the station waiting room as the detective boards his train. Each description matches exactly — grey wool coat, no face shown, no name given.
Reason

Three precise placements at structurally significant moments — discovery, verdict, departure — is too deliberate to be atmospheric detail. The consistent description without identification is a classic planted witness or observer figure. No chapter in the provided window resolves who she is or why she is present at each event.

Confidence
93% confidence
Missing Explanation

Her identity, her relationship to the victims or the detective, and whether her presence is coincidence or surveillance is never disclosed within the provided manuscript window.

Possible Explanations
  • A grieving relative who knows more than the police and is tracking their progress
  • An operative placed to monitor the investigation — or to interfere with it
  • The killer herself, returning to scenes she controls — a deliberate authorial reveal held for the final act
Chapter Mentions
Ch 2first appearance — crime scene
Ch 7second appearance — inquest crowd
Ch 14third appearance — station
Recommended Check
Confirm this figure is given a reveal in a later chapter. If the manuscript ends without identifying her, readers will read it as an unresolved loose end rather than the intended mystery — especially given the precision of the three placements.
High ⚠ Plot Hole
The siege lasts "three days" in Ch. 7 — but the characters experience six sunrises during it
Ch 7 · 2 mentions
Evidence
Ch 7: "The siege had lasted three days." Over the same sequence, the prose records eleven scene-time markers — morning, night, morning, night… — implying at least five full days have passed, not three.
Reason

Internal timeline contradiction. The stated duration (three days) conflicts with the number of day/night transitions in the same sequence. Readers tracking the chronology will notice the discrepancy and lose confidence in the narrative's reliability.

Confidence
97% confidence
Missing Explanation

No chapter between the stated duration and the sequence end reconciles the day count, nor is there any beat suggesting time distortion or character disorientation.

Possible Explanations
  • Change the stated duration to match the scene count — "five days" or "nearly a week"
  • Reduce the number of day/night transitions in the sequence to fit three days
  • Introduce a disorientation beat — a character notes the days have "blurred together"
Chapter Mentions
Ch 7source — "three days" stated
Ch 7contradiction — eleven time markers
Recommended Check
Count scene-time markers within the siege sequence and align the stated "three days" accordingly — or revise the number to match the prose evidence before returning the manuscript.

From manuscript to editorial report.

Three steps. No setup, no formatting requirements, no learning curve.

Step 01
Paste the manuscript
Drop in a chapter, a scene, or the full manuscript you received. Scriptorai reads the whole thing — not just a paragraph.
Supports: Plain text, pasted prose, any draft stage. No special formatting needed.
Step 02
AI reads for narrative
Not spell-check — story-check. Scriptor maps every planted detail, character mention, and unresolved tension across the entire manuscript.
Finds: Plot holes, unresolved threads, mystery setups, character inconsistencies, and punctuation errors — simultaneously.
Step 03
Deliver your editorial report
Browse the thread index, character roster, plot hole report, and timeline. Know exactly what needs raising before you write a single note.
Delivers: Ranked thread cards, correction log, character index — all based on what's actually in the manuscript.

Edit without limits.

If you don't like it, we'll return your money within 14 days of your purchase.

Premium
$19.99 /mo

For editors who take their craft to the next level.

500,000 credits / month
  • Everything in Pro
  • Priority AI processing (Even faster processing)
  • Early access to new features
  • Deep manuscript mode (200k+ words) — full novel analysis
Start Your Free Trial →

14-day free trial on all plans.

Trusted by editors who can't miss a thing.

★★★★★

"I used to spend two days going through a manuscript by hand looking for continuity issues. Scriptorai finds them in minutes — and catches things I would have missed."

SK
Sarah K.
Developmental Editor, 12 yrs experience
★★★★★

"The thread timeline alone is worth it. I can show authors exactly where their open threads are, chapter by chapter. No more vague editorial notes."

JT
James T.
Freelance Editor, Crime & Thriller
★★★★★

"I reviewed a 90,000-word thriller and Scriptorai flagged 14 issues I'd already caught — plus 3 I hadn't. That's the backup I need before a manuscript goes back to an author."

ML
Maria L.
Senior Editor, Literary Fiction
Start editing

Start editing with
confidence.

Cancel anytime.